Archive for June, 2012

A Collection of Incredibly Simple and Sleek Logo Designs


  

Logo design is a broad medium, full of diverse styles, genres and talents. With advancements in software many logo designs have become increasingly complex, utilizing wide color spectrums, complex gradients and intricate illustrations.

Whilst these logos are visually impressive, they often are not the most effective way to successfully communicate a brand or idea. Often a simpler, more basic logo will serve the company or individual better.

Today we demonstrate the power of a truly simple, sleek approach by presenting a collection of inspiring logo designs. We hope that these logos motivate you to try a ‘back to basics’ approach in your next design and really get to the heart of the brand in question.

Simple and Sleek Logo Designs

Angelina by contrast8
A wonderfully elegant logo that transforms the letter ‘A’ into a stylish logo graphic, with visual hints at a flower vase shape.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Valdao by magicshadow
Valdao uses a simplistic representation of a bird of prey to infer the companies qualities (speed, efficiency). The bird’s wings also form into a ‘V’ shape, whilst taking on the look of a stylish car emblem.

Simple, Sleek Logo

National Photography Month by firebrand
A very clever logo that combines the basic images of a camera with the national flag colors for Britain. Negative space is used effectively in this design to help construct the camera icons. The staggered camera icons allude to the passing of time/months (like calendar pages turning).

Simple, Sleek Logo

Discovery Finance by ricardobarroz
A very sleek logo that uses a stylish, arcing abstract shape to represent the concept of discovery and exploration inherent in the company’s name. The way that the logo icon wraps around itself feels secure and safe, which is relevant for the financial sector.

Simple, Sleek Logo

One Line by David Blazewicz
A very simple but clever concept – One Line’s logo is literally constructed of a single white line, contorted into elegant typography.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Tenfeet Productions by Daniel Evans
This logo uses ten simple feet icons to construct a stylish, memorable logo. The resulting icon feels highly creative due to the rainbow spectrum of colors used. It also hints at a camera lens iris.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Draft by Daniel Evans
The creative process of drafting is captured well in this simple logo, as the floating particles represent ideas passing and formulating.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Chic by Vikkiv
A bold, fun logo that includes the typography as part of a wider illustration. The letter ‘h’ in ‘chic’ becomes part of the chickens leg/foot and results in a highly unique, memorable logo design.

Simple, Sleek Logo

VineSquare by Bojan Stefanovic
A very simple logo concept that works very well. The ‘square’ part of the company name is represented by a very slight shift in hue between the left and right parts of the logo icon. This results in a boxed feel for the icon, as the center of the icon becomes a corner.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Todd Thiele Photography by Logomotive
A clever way to integrate the two ‘T’s of the company name into the logo. Two ‘T’s and a simple dot between them create the illusion of a camera by using negative space. The logo feels sleek and professional, being only as simple as is required to put across the visual concept.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Appex 2nd Proposal by ALL4LEO
The upwards arrow in this logo is both a simple representation of the letter ‘A’ in the company name and the concept of an Appex. The gradation of color occuring infers energy, drive and clarity.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Logo Milk by Designabot
This simple typographic treatment instantly evokes ‘milk’ and the illustrative splash is both stylish and fun. The concept is for a logo gallery that presents logos in black/white (their simplest form) and so appropriately is presented in monotone.

Simple, Sleek Logo

EAGER by Logotyped
An abstract logo that constructs a lowercase ‘e’ using a basic illustration of a wild cat. The wild cat is used to represent the strength, power and eagerness of the company.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Antarctica by A. William Patino
This cute logo uses a lowercase ‘a’ with a simple dot added to create a basic penguin illustration. An unbelievably simple, yet very effective typographic treatment that is totally relevant to the company’s name.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Love Puzzle by Mateausz Turbinski
This logo concept couldn’t be simpler – Love Puzzle – a heart constructed from interlocking puzzle pieces. The interlocking pieces help to show unity and connection.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Filmaps by Siah Design
This logo uses an image of a pin to represent the locational/maps aspect of the business. Very cleverly, a few simple squares are added to the pin design to give the impression of a film reel.

Simple, Sleek Logo

5 Locks by houston-we
Another incredibly simple, yet effective design. By cutting into the ‘o’ in ‘locks’ this logo gives the impression of a door keyhole. Wonderful typographic treatment!

Simple, Sleek Logo

Scissor by palattecorner
This simple, sleek logo creates a crest type symbol from two intersecting shapes. This resulting shape is a simplistic representation of some scissors, and provides a balanced, symmetrical symbol for this design.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Saltwater by ASD
This logo constructs a letter ‘S’ from two interlocking fish symbols. The mono-chrome logo is simple, sleek and professional and no more complex than it needs to be.

Simple, Sleek Logo

PowerBloom v2 by Julius Seniunas
A clever logo that combines the icons of a plant with an electrical plug. The icon is very minimal, yet perfectly captures the two concepts inherent in ‘Power Bloom’. The green leafs tie in with more of an environmental concept, whilst the contrasting red is more fitting for the idea of ‘power’.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Elephant Combs by TbwaIndia
A very simple, sleek design that creates the double illustration of a comb and an elephant simply by adding a dot (for an eye) in the top left of the minimal comb illustration.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Muchmore by Fayda
Possibly the simplest, and best concept in this entire collection. This purely typographic design perfectly encapsulates the concept of ‘more’ by each letter becoming increasingly bold. A great concept!

Simple, Sleek Logo

RIP Steve by Jonathan Mak
The logo that went around the world! This viral logo by Jonathan Mak is a great concept that incorporates the late Steve Jobs’ outline into the iconic Apple logo.

Simple, Sleek Logo

SpadeDealer v2 by Julius Seniunas
A clever logo that uses negative space between two simplistic hands to create the shape of a spade (from a deck of cards). The flexing hands create a sense of energy associated with a casino dealer.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Night Cat v2 by ALL4LEO
The basic curved outline of a cat overlaps a glowing semi-arch, giving the impression of the animal lurking in front of the moon. Another great example of negative space being used to show two concepts in one.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Edith Stein Foundation by LumaVine
The individual represented by this company is featured in the logo icon in her simplest form. The vector graphic presents the core of Edith Stein, communicating many values through a wry look to the viewer.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Green Hope by Master_ino
Another logo capturing two solid concepts in a single design. The long waves of green grass take on the form of an outreached hand, combining both environmental and community ideals.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Quality Performers by Antonio Cappucci
This logo captures a really intense atmosphere in a fairly simple design. The dark nighttime horizon depicted sits underneath a shining star. This logo may not be monotone or a single vector design, but considering that it is comprised of a few simple gradients we get a very immersive sense from it.

Simple, Sleek Logo

French Property Exhibition by Roy Smith
An incredible concept featuring a distorted French flag. The blue panel of the flag is transformed to appear like an opening door, which successfully marries the ideas of France with property.

Simple, Sleek Logo

CitiSync by Logomotive
The icon in this logo adds a cyclical detail to a classic cityscape outline. The result is a logo that has a definite urban feel, but also energy.

Simple, Sleek Logo

SOCIONIC by Logomotive
A wonderfully sleek and elegant logo, using flowing lines to create an attractively framed, ornate letter ‘S’. The logo has a really nice feeling of symmetry and balance and the monotone palette helps keep things simple and sleek.

Simple, Sleek Logo

Favorite Designs?

I hope that you enjoyed this article. Did you have any favorite logo designs in this collection? Do you prefer more complex, intricate logos or are you a fan of the simple/sleek style? Let us know in the comments below and we can get a discussion going!

(rb)


How Content Creators Benefit From The New SEO


  

Due to big changes in the SEO landscape, designers, photographers, videographers and writers have new opportunities to build their reputation, expand brand awareness and generate more leads. This post describes five important developments that content creators should be aware of, and then we’ll outline several ways to capitalize on them.

Five SEO Developments That Favor Content Producers

Thanks to self-publishing and social networks, the world is drowning in content. Google’s response: make it easy for searchers to drill down to exactly what they are looking for. Today, we can perform a search and look at the results all together in one big chunk, or we can carve off just a piece. We can look at search results from complete strangers, from people we know or from both.

In the past, search results simply connected keywords to websites. Today, in pursuit of an easier way to drill down, Google also connects keywords to social networks, user behavior and authors. Here are five ways this is playing out, and why it’s all great news for content creators.

1. Personalized Search

While search engine users are accustomed to getting objective results on search engine results pages (SERPs), Google now serves up “subjective� results as well. When logged into Google and with personalized search turned on, you will see SERPs that include results based on your Web browsing history, as well as content authored or endorsed by your social connections.

Personalization can radically change what you see in regular searches and image searches. Here is a Google image search that demonstrates the difference. My search for “how to use twitter� with personalization turned off yields the following:


Image search without personalization.

With personalization turned on, the results look like this:


Image search with personalization.

Notice that the first two rows of images are completely different. At the top of my personalized search, I see 10 images associated with my Google+ connections. With personalized search turned on, I also have the option to view only my personal results.

This is intriguing. Google is doing everything it can to encourage personalized search. It has a selfish interest in doing so: it wants as many people as possible to be logged into Google for as long as possible, using Google products, providing Google with data and being exposed to personalized Google ads. As personalized search gains traction with users, content creators will be able to gain a lot of search visibility in three ways:

  1. Creators become visible to their direct connections.
    Content associated with a particular creator will get top position in personalized searches conducted by people who have circled them. Imagine what would happen if a creator tripled the number of circles they were in, or if Google began to incorporate Twitter and Pinterest follows into its personalized search results.
  2. Creators become visible to their indirect connections.
    If a creator’s content is endorsed by someone in the Google+ network, the content could appear in the personalized results of searches conducted by that person’s connections. The ripple effect can extend a considerable distance.
  3. Creators become visible to people who visit their website.
    If someone frequents a creator’s website, Google will serve that creator’s content in their personalized searches.

The trend: As time goes on, expect Google to get smarter about how it ranks personalized content, and for Google to cast a wider net across social networks to retrieve it.

Quick tip for creatives: Strengthen and broaden your social connections to give your work more exposure on search engines. Keep looking for better ways to bring new visitors to your website, and to keep them coming back.

2. The Importance of Social Shares

One factor that Google considers in evaluating a page of content is its social shares. Google sees likes, +1s, tweets and other types of shares as indicators of content quality and trustworthiness. This is reasonable enough: a blog post with 1500 retweets has more clearly established value than a comparable post with five.


Social sharing is more important than ever.

At the moment, how much value Google accords to social shares is still unclear, which is fair enough because many questions remain unanswered. Is a tweet more or less valuable than a like? How do you evaluate the authority of the person doing the sharing? How are people gaming the system to inflate the number of shares?

Nevertheless, we should expect social sharing to grow in importance for SEO. First, there is demand: people would love to consider social endorsements for certain types of searches, provided they have confidence in the data. Secondly, there is self-interest: Google is committed to its social network, Google+, and isn’t about to ignore it on its own search engine.

The trend: Social sharing now has its biggest impact on standard search results. Expect Google to ratchet up the presence of share-influenced links in personalized results as well. For instance, we could start to see a variety of segmented search options that display content shared by a defined subset of your connections.

Quick tip for creatives: Make social-sharing buttons prominent to make it easy for people to share content on your website; actively engage in social media; and publish your content on websites where content is widely shared.

3. The Rise Of Search Segmentation

In the old days, there weren’t too many ways to slice and dice search results. Today, there are scores. Tomorrow, there will be hundreds.


Multiple search options create opportunities.

More segmentation means more opportunity for freelance authors to improve their search visibility based on the nature of their content. When results are lumped together in one big mass, it’s challenging for a small enterprise to stand out. However, if creatives focus their content efforts on, for example, standing out in a particular segment, then they could capture a larger share of segmented searches. (An example of how to go about this appears in the “Reading Level� segment in the next section.)

Note, too, that segmented search offers a “personalized� option, where, again, users can zero in on content based on their browsing history and social connections.

The trend: Google will continue to categorize content to help users drill down to search results that are precisely relevant to their intent, rather than broadly relevant to their keywords. In particular, segmented search options for images and video will become much more sophisticated, in response to our insatiable appetite for visual content.

Quick tip for creatives: Stay current on how Google segments content, and shape yours to stand out in segments that are natural homes for your work.

4. More Emphasis on Quality and More Transparency

For years, creatives have complained that “black hatâ€� SEO tactics pollute rankings, pushing high-quality content down the page. However, as Google’s algorithm grows more sophisticated, it gets better at combatting black-hat practices — more great news for content producers.


Google is sending clearer SEO signals.

Google fights content spam by emphasizing quality in its algorithm and by being transparent in how quality is calculated. Quality has always been a focus; the current level of transparency is something new.

Google’s Panda update, released in 2011, was a declaration of war against content manipulators. A primary goal of this algorithm change — and of many that followed — was to decisively penalize worthless content and to reward highly relevant, meaningful and trustworthy content.

In addition to the algorithmic measures, Google is taking the smoke and mirrors out of search by more openly communicating algorithm changes to SEOs and the general public.

Why? In some cases, black-hat tactics were inadvertent, caused by website administrators using outdated techniques or misinterpreting Google’s algorithmic intent. Furthermore, a good deal of high-quality content gets lost in the search shuffle because creators simply ignore SEO. More than ever, Google wants every website to be optimized and optimized properly. The more high-caliber content Google can serve up to users in SERPs, the more business it will do.

The trend: Google will push hard in this direction, devising more accurate methods of evaluating the relevance, substance and trustworthiness of content. It will get better at interpreting both the inherent quality of the work itself and the social-sharing data associated with it.

Quick tip for creatives: Stay up to date on how to communicate the quality of your text, images and video to Google. (Links to step-by-step tutorials on how to do this are provided at the end of this post.)

5. Google+ and the rel=author Link

Google enthusiasts see the Google+ social network as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Most everybody else thinks Google+ is less useful for marketing than sliced bread. But whether or not you like Google+, the network cannot be ignored for SEO. Content creators ought to take note of two particular aspects of the network.


The rel=author link builds a creator’s brand and search visibility.

First, Google+ content gets indexed and ranked. In fact, when you publish original content on Google+, not only is it indexed and ranked, but it is given prime positioning in personalized SERPs. Images and video that are stored on Google or associated with personal pages on Google+ also receive greater exposure in search, as demonstrated earlier in the screen captures for image search.

Secondly, the rel=author link associates a page of Web content with its author’s personal Google+ profile. This is a technical mouthful, but it’s a big deal for creatives. Google has begun to link content to its creators as well as its publishers. “Authorship markup,� or “author rank,� is being developed at a furious rate because people sometimes want the option of searching for content by a particular creator or want results ranked according to the authority or expertise of the creators.

The trend: High-authority creators will see their content become more visible in search results, and for that reason, publishers will need to seek out high-authority creators to boost traffic to their websites.

Quick tip for creatives: Set up a personal Google+ profile and incorporate the rel=author link into your published content. (Instructions on how to do this are provided in the next section.)

How To Capitalize On The New SEO

Given these recent developments, let’s look at how authors can manage their content to increase its visibility and obtain all of the benefits that go along with that. Some of the following suggestions are technical in nature, while others are creative techniques that are not always thought of as aspects of SEO. However, with Google getting better at evaluating the quality of content, people are now less able to inflate the ranking of inferior content through technical manipulation and must instead treat the quality of their content itself as the linchpin of their SEO program.

Create Highly Sharable Content

SEO is no longer a game of mechanical keyword placement. In fact, SEO has moved even beyond a game of relevance and substance. For content to succeed in search today, it must be relevant, substantive and sharable. Content creators can use a variety of stylistic and marketing techniques to enhance social interest in their content, including the following:

  1. Convert dry text into visually engaging content to generate immediate interest;
  2. Provide consistently informative, well-researched and enlightening content that generates long-term interest;
  3. Develop a unique voice and style;
  4. Take a provocative stance or add humor when appropriate and compatible with the corporate style;
  5. Provide detailed content on a topic that has not been widely covered (scarcity of information increases demand);
  6. Attribute information to factual sources (trustworthy content is more confidently shared);
  7. Link generously (encourage sharing by setting a good example);
  8. Title content creatively to spark curiosity;
  9. Use Web design and typographic best practices to optimize readability and scannability;
  10. Embed video in blog posts and Web pages;
  11. Display attractive and intuitive social-sharing buttons;
  12. Give users an incentive to share.

Set-Up Methods and Benefits: Use The rel=author Link

Here’s a basic outline of how to set up rel=author links for your content. Google has a more thorough rundown.

  1. Create a personal Google+ profile page with a high-quality headshot;
  2. Validate your email address;
  3. In the byline of any content that you create, set the anchor text to be your name as it appears in your Google+ profile, and link to your profile with a URL that looks like this: https://plus.google.com/102318046680468697385?rel=author.
  4. When your content is published, link back to its URL from the “Contributor to� section of your Google+ profile.

Once your content is indexed, your Google+ profile picture and name, along with the publication date, title and description, will (sometimes) appear in SERPs, in both standard and personalized results. This gives you more exposure, and it instills trust in users that the content has a human author, and that the author is reputable. This adds up to higher ranking and more people clicking through to your content.

Please note: Author attribution is still in the early stages of development. Google frequently changes both the procedures for setting up links and the presentation of author information in SERPs. The instructional link above should be up to date whenever you are ready to dive in.

How to set up different types of content:

  • Guest blog posts
    Set up a rel=author link somewhere in your content. The most sensible place to do this is either in the byline or in the bio area. If the blog doesn’t accommodate such placement, then a rel=author link in the body of the post would work, too.
  • Infographics
    If you create an infographic, add a blurb below the image saying, “Infographic by [your name],� with a rel=author link.
  • Video
    Follow the same procedure as described above for infographics.
  • Dual authorship
    What if an article is coauthored or the author wants to credit a photographer? The best practice is to use only one rel=author link per page. If more than one link appears on a page, the first that appears in the markup will be the one whose name and image are featured in SERPs.

Bring Back Blog Marketing

Blogs are back. In terms of social sharing, blog posts are far more likely to be shared than standard Web pages. In terms of segmentation, blog posts figure prominently in search segments such as news, time ranges and, of course, blogs. Here are some blogging techniques that fit especially well in today’s SEO environment:

  • Incorporate the rel=author link into the byline of every post in your archive.
    This establishes you as the author and gives all of your existing content an SEO boost. Several WordPress plugins are available to automatically set up the links for single- and multi-author blogs. If you are using another CMS, check with the developer to see whether and how it supports rel=author linking.
  • Ramp up guest blogging efforts.
    Getting published on highly authoritative, highly shared blogs has always been useful, and adding the rel=author link to your guest posts delivers even more value.
  • Blog directly on Google+.
    Earlier, we mentioned that Google indexes and ranks original Google+ posts. To take advantage of this, some “plussers� are actually writing lengthy original posts on the network. This strategy could be well worth testing, especially if you already have an active presence on the network. And it could work particularly well for photographers, designers and videographers, who can surround their visual content with keyword-optimized text.

Consider the Reading Level When Composing

Let’s consider an example of creating targeted content to capitalize on Google’s segmented search.

Depending on the topic, writing at a particular reading level could be quite advantageous for SEO. For instance, here is how Google categorizes content that matches a search for “social media marketing�:

If you wrote a post about social media marketing at an advanced reading level, Google would probably rank it very low in its fully aggregated SERPs. Because the vast majority of content (82%) is written at an intermediate level, Google assumes that is what searchers are looking for.

However, for segmented searches, it’s a different story. Writing an advanced article would probably make you highly visible to people drilling down to that reading level. And even though it’s a small group (2%), it could include people with a lot of interest and ready to take action.

Another possibility is to write a basic article about social media marketing. Here again, there is less search competition (16%), and there is a good chance that people who are new to social media will want to drill down to basic articles.

Google does not clearly explain how it defines these three reading levels. But its model, according to Google’s Daniel M. Russell, is based primarily on input from teachers who have classified various pages of text. You can read more about Google’s reading level model on Russell’s personal blog.

The New SEO Formula: Relevance + Substance + Shares = Visibility

At one time, SEO was a fairly straightforward exercise in shaping content on a particular domain to rank highly on basically one flavor of SERPs for a given set of queries.

But as we’ve seen, Google now considers who created the content in addition to where the content lives, and query options have expanded thanks to the segmentation of search options. On top of all this, personalized search options enable users to view results based on the online behavior of themselves and their social media connections.

While technical expertise still matters tremendously in SEO, authorship is gaining ground, and quickly. Google is attempting to cut out the SEO middleman and make search a matter of directly connecting great content creators (as defined by the inherent quality of their work and their popularity) with searchers who will find great value in their content. This explains why Google is being more forthcoming about its algorithm: the maneuver levels the technical playing field and forces SEO practitioners to differentiate themselves through the content itself. What more could content creators ask for?

Resources

Below are resources containing detailed information on content-related SEO techniques that should be of interest to creatives who market themselves and their work.

Note: All images used for this post have exclusively been created by Straight North.

(al) (il)


© Brad Shorr for Smashing Magazine, 2012.


How Content Creators Benefit From The New SEO


  

Due to big changes in the SEO landscape, designers, photographers, videographers and writers have new opportunities to build their reputation, expand brand awareness and generate more leads. This post describes five important developments that content creators should be aware of, and then we’ll outline several ways to capitalize on them.

Five SEO Developments That Favor Content Producers

Thanks to self-publishing and social networks, the world is drowning in content. Google’s response: make it easy for searchers to drill down to exactly what they are looking for. Today, we can perform a search and look at the results all together in one big chunk, or we can carve off just a piece. We can look at search results from complete strangers, from people we know or from both.

In the past, search results simply connected keywords to websites. Today, in pursuit of an easier way to drill down, Google also connects keywords to social networks, user behavior and authors. Here are five ways this is playing out, and why it’s all great news for content creators.

1. Personalized Search

While search engine users are accustomed to getting objective results on search engine results pages (SERPs), Google now serves up “subjective� results as well. When logged into Google and with personalized search turned on, you will see SERPs that include results based on your Web browsing history, as well as content authored or endorsed by your social connections.

Personalization can radically change what you see in regular searches and image searches. Here is a Google image search that demonstrates the difference. My search for “how to use twitter� with personalization turned off yields the following:


Image search without personalization.

With personalization turned on, the results look like this:


Image search with personalization.

Notice that the first two rows of images are completely different. At the top of my personalized search, I see 10 images associated with my Google+ connections. With personalized search turned on, I also have the option to view only my personal results.

This is intriguing. Google is doing everything it can to encourage personalized search. It has a selfish interest in doing so: it wants as many people as possible to be logged into Google for as long as possible, using Google products, providing Google with data and being exposed to personalized Google ads. As personalized search gains traction with users, content creators will be able to gain a lot of search visibility in three ways:

  1. Creators become visible to their direct connections.
    Content associated with a particular creator will get top position in personalized searches conducted by people who have circled them. Imagine what would happen if a creator tripled the number of circles they were in, or if Google began to incorporate Twitter and Pinterest follows into its personalized search results.
  2. Creators become visible to their indirect connections.
    If a creator’s content is endorsed by someone in the Google+ network, the content could appear in the personalized results of searches conducted by that person’s connections. The ripple effect can extend a considerable distance.
  3. Creators become visible to people who visit their website.
    If someone frequents a creator’s website, Google will serve that creator’s content in their personalized searches.

The trend: As time goes on, expect Google to get smarter about how it ranks personalized content, and for Google to cast a wider net across social networks to retrieve it.

Quick tip for creatives: Strengthen and broaden your social connections to give your work more exposure on search engines. Keep looking for better ways to bring new visitors to your website, and to keep them coming back.

2. The Importance of Social Shares

One factor that Google considers in evaluating a page of content is its social shares. Google sees likes, +1s, tweets and other types of shares as indicators of content quality and trustworthiness. This is reasonable enough: a blog post with 1500 retweets has more clearly established value than a comparable post with five.


Social sharing is more important than ever.

At the moment, how much value Google accords to social shares is still unclear, which is fair enough because many questions remain unanswered. Is a tweet more or less valuable than a like? How do you evaluate the authority of the person doing the sharing? How are people gaming the system to inflate the number of shares?

Nevertheless, we should expect social sharing to grow in importance for SEO. First, there is demand: people would love to consider social endorsements for certain types of searches, provided they have confidence in the data. Secondly, there is self-interest: Google is committed to its social network, Google+, and isn’t about to ignore it on its own search engine.

The trend: Social sharing now has its biggest impact on standard search results. Expect Google to ratchet up the presence of share-influenced links in personalized results as well. For instance, we could start to see a variety of segmented search options that display content shared by a defined subset of your connections.

Quick tip for creatives: Make social-sharing buttons prominent to make it easy for people to share content on your website; actively engage in social media; and publish your content on websites where content is widely shared.

3. The Rise Of Search Segmentation

In the old days, there weren’t too many ways to slice and dice search results. Today, there are scores. Tomorrow, there will be hundreds.


Multiple search options create opportunities.

More segmentation means more opportunity for freelance authors to improve their search visibility based on the nature of their content. When results are lumped together in one big mass, it’s challenging for a small enterprise to stand out. However, if creatives focus their content efforts on, for example, standing out in a particular segment, then they could capture a larger share of segmented searches. (An example of how to go about this appears in the “Reading Level� segment in the next section.)

Note, too, that segmented search offers a “personalized� option, where, again, users can zero in on content based on their browsing history and social connections.

The trend: Google will continue to categorize content to help users drill down to search results that are precisely relevant to their intent, rather than broadly relevant to their keywords. In particular, segmented search options for images and video will become much more sophisticated, in response to our insatiable appetite for visual content.

Quick tip for creatives: Stay current on how Google segments content, and shape yours to stand out in segments that are natural homes for your work.

4. More Emphasis on Quality and More Transparency

For years, creatives have complained that “black hatâ€� SEO tactics pollute rankings, pushing high-quality content down the page. However, as Google’s algorithm grows more sophisticated, it gets better at combatting black-hat practices — more great news for content producers.


Google is sending clearer SEO signals.

Google fights content spam by emphasizing quality in its algorithm and by being transparent in how quality is calculated. Quality has always been a focus; the current level of transparency is something new.

Google’s Panda update, released in 2011, was a declaration of war against content manipulators. A primary goal of this algorithm change — and of many that followed — was to decisively penalize worthless content and to reward highly relevant, meaningful and trustworthy content.

In addition to the algorithmic measures, Google is taking the smoke and mirrors out of search by more openly communicating algorithm changes to SEOs and the general public.

Why? In some cases, black-hat tactics were inadvertent, caused by website administrators using outdated techniques or misinterpreting Google’s algorithmic intent. Furthermore, a good deal of high-quality content gets lost in the search shuffle because creators simply ignore SEO. More than ever, Google wants every website to be optimized and optimized properly. The more high-caliber content Google can serve up to users in SERPs, the more business it will do.

The trend: Google will push hard in this direction, devising more accurate methods of evaluating the relevance, substance and trustworthiness of content. It will get better at interpreting both the inherent quality of the work itself and the social-sharing data associated with it.

Quick tip for creatives: Stay up to date on how to communicate the quality of your text, images and video to Google. (Links to step-by-step tutorials on how to do this are provided at the end of this post.)

5. Google+ and the rel=author Link

Google enthusiasts see the Google+ social network as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Most everybody else thinks Google+ is less useful for marketing than sliced bread. But whether or not you like Google+, the network cannot be ignored for SEO. Content creators ought to take note of two particular aspects of the network.


The rel=author link builds a creator’s brand and search visibility.

First, Google+ content gets indexed and ranked. In fact, when you publish original content on Google+, not only is it indexed and ranked, but it is given prime positioning in personalized SERPs. Images and video that are stored on Google or associated with personal pages on Google+ also receive greater exposure in search, as demonstrated earlier in the screen captures for image search.

Secondly, the rel=author link associates a page of Web content with its author’s personal Google+ profile. This is a technical mouthful, but it’s a big deal for creatives. Google has begun to link content to its creators as well as its publishers. “Authorship markup,� or “author rank,� is being developed at a furious rate because people sometimes want the option of searching for content by a particular creator or want results ranked according to the authority or expertise of the creators.

The trend: High-authority creators will see their content become more visible in search results, and for that reason, publishers will need to seek out high-authority creators to boost traffic to their websites.

Quick tip for creatives: Set up a personal Google+ profile and incorporate the rel=author link into your published content. (Instructions on how to do this are provided in the next section.)

How To Capitalize On The New SEO

Given these recent developments, let’s look at how authors can manage their content to increase its visibility and obtain all of the benefits that go along with that. Some of the following suggestions are technical in nature, while others are creative techniques that are not always thought of as aspects of SEO. However, with Google getting better at evaluating the quality of content, people are now less able to inflate the ranking of inferior content through technical manipulation and must instead treat the quality of their content itself as the linchpin of their SEO program.

Create Highly Sharable Content

SEO is no longer a game of mechanical keyword placement. In fact, SEO has moved even beyond a game of relevance and substance. For content to succeed in search today, it must be relevant, substantive and sharable. Content creators can use a variety of stylistic and marketing techniques to enhance social interest in their content, including the following:

  1. Convert dry text into visually engaging content to generate immediate interest;
  2. Provide consistently informative, well-researched and enlightening content that generates long-term interest;
  3. Develop a unique voice and style;
  4. Take a provocative stance or add humor when appropriate and compatible with the corporate style;
  5. Provide detailed content on a topic that has not been widely covered (scarcity of information increases demand);
  6. Attribute information to factual sources (trustworthy content is more confidently shared);
  7. Link generously (encourage sharing by setting a good example);
  8. Title content creatively to spark curiosity;
  9. Use Web design and typographic best practices to optimize readability and scannability;
  10. Embed video in blog posts and Web pages;
  11. Display attractive and intuitive social-sharing buttons;
  12. Give users an incentive to share.

Set-Up Methods and Benefits: Use The rel=author Link

Here’s a basic outline of how to set up rel=author links for your content. Google has a more thorough rundown.

  1. Create a personal Google+ profile page with a high-quality headshot;
  2. Validate your email address;
  3. In the byline of any content that you create, set the anchor text to be your name as it appears in your Google+ profile, and link to your profile with a URL that looks like this: https://plus.google.com/102318046680468697385?rel=author.
  4. When your content is published, link back to its URL from the “Contributor to� section of your Google+ profile.

Once your content is indexed, your Google+ profile picture and name, along with the publication date, title and description, will (sometimes) appear in SERPs, in both standard and personalized results. This gives you more exposure, and it instills trust in users that the content has a human author, and that the author is reputable. This adds up to higher ranking and more people clicking through to your content.

Please note: Author attribution is still in the early stages of development. Google frequently changes both the procedures for setting up links and the presentation of author information in SERPs. The instructional link above should be up to date whenever you are ready to dive in.

How to set up different types of content:

  • Guest blog posts
    Set up a rel=author link somewhere in your content. The most sensible place to do this is either in the byline or in the bio area. If the blog doesn’t accommodate such placement, then a rel=author link in the body of the post would work, too.
  • Infographics
    If you create an infographic, add a blurb below the image saying, “Infographic by [your name],� with a rel=author link.
  • Video
    Follow the same procedure as described above for infographics.
  • Dual authorship
    What if an article is coauthored or the author wants to credit a photographer? The best practice is to use only one rel=author link per page. If more than one link appears on a page, the first that appears in the markup will be the one whose name and image are featured in SERPs.

Bring Back Blog Marketing

Blogs are back. In terms of social sharing, blog posts are far more likely to be shared than standard Web pages. In terms of segmentation, blog posts figure prominently in search segments such as news, time ranges and, of course, blogs. Here are some blogging techniques that fit especially well in today’s SEO environment:

  • Incorporate the rel=author link into the byline of every post in your archive.
    This establishes you as the author and gives all of your existing content an SEO boost. Several WordPress plugins are available to automatically set up the links for single- and multi-author blogs. If you are using another CMS, check with the developer to see whether and how it supports rel=author linking.
  • Ramp up guest blogging efforts.
    Getting published on highly authoritative, highly shared blogs has always been useful, and adding the rel=author link to your guest posts delivers even more value.
  • Blog directly on Google+.
    Earlier, we mentioned that Google indexes and ranks original Google+ posts. To take advantage of this, some “plussers� are actually writing lengthy original posts on the network. This strategy could be well worth testing, especially if you already have an active presence on the network. And it could work particularly well for photographers, designers and videographers, who can surround their visual content with keyword-optimized text.

Consider the Reading Level When Composing

Let’s consider an example of creating targeted content to capitalize on Google’s segmented search.

Depending on the topic, writing at a particular reading level could be quite advantageous for SEO. For instance, here is how Google categorizes content that matches a search for “social media marketing�:

If you wrote a post about social media marketing at an advanced reading level, Google would probably rank it very low in its fully aggregated SERPs. Because the vast majority of content (82%) is written at an intermediate level, Google assumes that is what searchers are looking for.

However, for segmented searches, it’s a different story. Writing an advanced article would probably make you highly visible to people drilling down to that reading level. And even though it’s a small group (2%), it could include people with a lot of interest and ready to take action.

Another possibility is to write a basic article about social media marketing. Here again, there is less search competition (16%), and there is a good chance that people who are new to social media will want to drill down to basic articles.

Google does not clearly explain how it defines these three reading levels. But its model, according to Google’s Daniel M. Russell, is based primarily on input from teachers who have classified various pages of text. You can read more about Google’s reading level model on Russell’s personal blog.

The New SEO Formula: Relevance + Substance + Shares = Visibility

At one time, SEO was a fairly straightforward exercise in shaping content on a particular domain to rank highly on basically one flavor of SERPs for a given set of queries.

But as we’ve seen, Google now considers who created the content in addition to where the content lives, and query options have expanded thanks to the segmentation of search options. On top of all this, personalized search options enable users to view results based on the online behavior of themselves and their social media connections.

While technical expertise still matters tremendously in SEO, authorship is gaining ground, and quickly. Google is attempting to cut out the SEO middleman and make search a matter of directly connecting great content creators (as defined by the inherent quality of their work and their popularity) with searchers who will find great value in their content. This explains why Google is being more forthcoming about its algorithm: the maneuver levels the technical playing field and forces SEO practitioners to differentiate themselves through the content itself. What more could content creators ask for?

Resources

Below are resources containing detailed information on content-related SEO techniques that should be of interest to creatives who market themselves and their work.

Note: All images used for this post have exclusively been created by Straight North.

(al) (il)


© Brad Shorr for Smashing Magazine, 2012.


Adobe Illustrator Tutorial: Create a Printer Illustration


  

In the following Adobe Illustrator tutorial you will learn how to create a detailed printer illustration. We’ll start with two simple rectangles and some basic vector shape building techniques. Once we have our starting shapes we’ll continue with some Pathfinder options, a bunch of complex linear gradients and some simple effects. For the highlights we’ll use some simple blending techniques along with some new effects and pixel perfect vector shape building techniques.

Final Image

As always, this is the final image that we’ll be creating:

Step 1

Hit Control + N to create a new document. Enter 600 in the width and height box then click on the Advanced button. Select RGB, Screen (72ppi) and make sure that the "Align New Objects to Pixel Grid" box is unchecked before you click OK. Now, turn on the Grid (View > Grid) and the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid). Next, you’ll need a grid every 5px.

Go to Edit > Preferences > Guides & Grid, enter 5 in the Gridline every box and 1 in the Subdivisions box. You can also open the Info panel (Window > Info) for a live preview with the size and position of your shapes. Do not forget to set the unit of measurement to pixels from Edit > Preferences > Unit > General. All these options will significantly increase your work speed.

Step 2

Pick the Rectangle Tool(M) and create a 350 by 160px shape. Fill it with a random color, make sure that it has no color set for the stroke and go to Object > Path > Add Anchor Points. Keep this new shape selected and switch to the Direction Selection Tool(A). Select the middle, left and middle, right anchor points (highlighted in the second image) and simply drag them 25px up. The Snap to Grid will ease your work.

Step 3

Keep focusing on the shape created in the previous step and continue with the Direct Selection Tool(A). Select the top, left anchor point and move it 20px to the right then select the top, right anchor point and move it 20px to the left. Move down, select the bottom, left anchor point and move it 5px to the right then select the bottom, right anchor point and move it 5px to the left. In the end your shape should look like in the second image. Make sure that it’s still selected and go to Effect > Stylize > Rounded Corners. Enter a 5px radius, click OK and go to Object > Expand Appearance.

Step 4

Pick the Rectangle Tool(M), create a 360 by 5px shape and place it as shown in the first image. Select it along with the shape created in the previous step and duplicate them (Control + C > Control + F). Select these copies, open the Pathfinder panel (Window > Pathfinder) and click on the Intersect button. Fill the resulting shape with the linear gradient shown in the final image. The white numbers from the gradient image stand for location percentage.

Step 5

Reselect the original thin rectangle created in the previous step along with the large shape created in the starting steps and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Move to the Layers panel (Window > Layers) and you will find a new group with two separate shapes. Select it and ungroup it (Shift + Control + G). Focus on the bottom shape, select it and fill it with the linear gradient shown in the final image.

Step 6

Disable the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid) then go to Edit > Preferences > General and make sure that the Keyboard Increment is set at 1px. Reselect the shape edited in the finale of the previous step and make two copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and hit the down arrow once (to move it 1px down). Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with black.

Step 7

Reselect the shape edited in the finale of the fifth step and go to Object > Path > Offset Path. Enter a -2px Offset and click OK. Duplicate the resulting shape (Control + C > Control + F). Select this copy and move it 2px down. Reselect both shapes created in this step and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with R=166 G=169 B=174, lower its opacity to 50% and go to Effect > Blur > Gaussian Blur. Enter a 2px radius and click OK.

Step 8

Once again, select the shape edited in the finale of the fifth step and make two copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 3px up. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with R=23 G=37 B=52.

Step 9

Move to the top shape created in the fifth step. Select it and fill it with the linear gradient shown in the following image.

Step 10

Reselect the shape edited in the previous step and make two copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 1px down and to the right. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with a random color, for now.

Step 11

Reselect the shape edited in the ninth step and make two new copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 1px down and to the left. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Again, fill the resulting shape with a random color.

Step 12

Reselect the two shapes created in the last two steps and click on the Unite button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with the linear gradient shown in the following image.

Step 13

Reselect the shape edited in the ninth step and make two copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 1px up. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with R=244 G=244 B=244.

Step 14

Enable the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid). Pick the Rectangle Tool(M), create a 190 by 30px shape, fill it with black and place it as shown in the first image. Switch to the Direct Selection Tool(A) and focus on this new shape. Select the top, left anchor point and move it 10px to the right then select the top, right anchor point and move it 10px to the left.

In the end your shape should look like a trapezoid (image #2). Select it and go to Effect > Stylize > Rounded Corners. Enter a 5px radius, click OK and go to Object > Expand Appearance.

Step 15

Reselect the shape edited in the ninth step and make a copy in front (Control + C > Control + F). Select it along with the shape created in the previous step and click on the Intersect button from the Pathfinder panel.

Step 16

Disable the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid). Reselect the shape created in the previous step and make two copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 1px down. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with the linear gradient shown in the final image.

Step 17

Reselect the shape created in the fifteenth step and make two new copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 7px down. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with the linear gradient shown in the final image.

Step 18

Reselect the shape created in the fifteenth step and go to Effect > Stylize > Drop Shadow. Enter the properties shown in the left window, click OK and go again to Effect > Stylize > Drop Shadow. Enter the properties shown in the right window and click OK.

Step 19

Enable the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid). Pick the Rectangle Tool(M), create a 140 by 150px shape, fill it with the linear gradient shown below and place it as shown in the following image.

Step 20

Disable the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid). Reselect the shape created in the previous step and go to Object > Path > Offset Path. Enter a -1px Offset and click OK. Duplicate the resulting shape (Control + C > Control + F). Select this copy and move it 1px down. Reselect both shape created in this step and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with R=250 G=250 B=250.

Step 21

Reselect the shape created in the nineteenth step and make two copies in front (Control + C > Control + F > Control + F). Select the top copy and move it 5px up. Reselect both copies and click on the Minus Front button from the Pathfinder panel. Fill the resulting shape with black and lower its opacity to 3%.

Step 22

Enable the Snap to Grid (View > Snap to Grid). Pick the Rectangle Tool(M), create a 230 by 85px shape, fill it with the linear gradient shown below and place it as shown in the first image. Switch to the Direct Selection Tool(A), select the bottom, left anchor point and move it 5px to the right then select the bottom, right anchor point and move it 5px to the left.

Make sure that this new shape is selected and go to Effect > Stylize > Rounded Corners. Enter a 5px radius, click OK and go to Object > Expand Appearance. Finally, select the resulting shape and go to Effect > Stylize > Inner Glow. Enter the data shown in the final image and click OK.

Step 23

Pick the Rectangle Tool(M), create a 170 by 45px shape, fill it with the linear gradient shown below and place it as shown in the following image. Select it and go to Effect > Stylize > Inner Glow. Enter the properties shown below, click OK and go to Effect Stylize > Drop Shadow. Again, enter the data shown in the following image and click OK.

More on Page Two

That is only half the chore, there is still more tutorial to work through on page two.


Form-Field Validation: The Errors-Only Approach


  

Error pages for form-field validation are dreadful. You’ve just filled out 20 form fields, yet you get the same bloated page thrown back in your face because a single field failed to validate.

I clearly recall the often loud sighs of despair during our last usability study each time a test subject encountered a validation error page.

We also noticed that test subjects who had been exposed to validation errors began to take preventive actions to avoid them in subsequent steps, by writing things such as “N/A� in the “Company name� field if in doubt about whether the field was optional.

Form Field Validation Error Page at BlueNile.com
When getting the exact same page but with an error message, the user will feel they have made little or no progress, despite having typed 90% of the form fields correctly. (Image: Blue Nile)

Some of the frustration with validation error pages likely stems from the user being returned to the same page they came from. Being returned to the exact same page is problematic for a couple of reasons:

  1. With all form fields still displayed (valid or not), the user might have difficulty identifying the few erroneous fields among the many valid ones.
  2. More critically, seeing the same page twice makes it seem like the user has made no progress, despite having just filled in numerous form fields correctly.

At Baymard Institute, we reflected on this problem and got an idea that we call “error fields onlyâ€� — which is exactly what this article is about. Before exploring this idea, let’s look at three traditional types of validation techniques: “same page reload,â€� “optimized same page reloadâ€� and “live inline validation.â€�

1. The Traditional Way: Same Page Reload

Here’s a typical validation error page from Staples’ checkout process:

Staples validation error
The current error page for Staples’ checkout process. Besides having a subpar indication of errors, Staples also breaks a handful of checkout usability guidelines.

When the user first submits the page, the entire page is reloaded, but with indications of validation errors. A message at the top of the page tells the user they have made an error and describes what the error is; further down the page, the label for the erroneous field is in bold and red.

This is significantly better than the sad practice some websites adopt of only highlighting the erroneous field in red or bold (without any description) and letting the user guess what went wrong. But the implementation could be much more thorough. Let’s look at how Staples’ page could be improved.

2. Same Page Reload: Optimized

To have a fairer baseline for comparison, we’ve made three changes to substantially improve Staples’ error page:

Mock-up of an optimized Staples validation error page. Click for full size.
A simple mockup of an optimized version of Staples’ error page. Notice the anchor link at the top and the tailored description near the erroneous fields.

The three changes are:

  1. The error description at the top indicates the number of errors (if there’s more than one) and lists them.
  2. These listed errors are links that take the user directly to the corresponding field (especially important in long forms).
  3. A tailored message for each erroneous field shows either an example of correctly formatted data (for example, john@example.com) or a tip on what might be wrong with the data (for example, “Looks like the ending in the email address you provided is missing (.com, .org, etc.),â€� instead of just “Email wrong — please correct.â€�

Now, in addition to being able to locate the erroneous fields and spot multiple errors more easily, the user actually has guidance on how to correct their data. Some input errors are plain cases of mistyping or obvious details being forgotten, which most users will spot immediately; but if the user lacks clues and can’t instantly see why the data is invalid and has to guess in order to proceed, then they will likely abandon the process.

While better, this second implementation (and the first) still result in a poor experience. The user still gets the whole page with all 31 form fields thrown back at them, despite having inputted 90% of the fields correctly. The signal-to-noise ratio is still high (two errors among all valid fields). The user will likely scroll up and down the form to make sure all errors have been fixed and, finally, scroll down to click that “Continue� button once again. This diminishes the user’s sense of accomplishment and makes their effort to resolve the errors unnecessarily cumbersome.

3. Live Inline Validation

A very effective technique that resolves some of the issues with the last method is “live inline validation.�

Twitter use Live Inline Validation at their sign-up page. Image credit: Twitter.com

Here, each form field is validated separately as the user types. The error handling is most often instant, with the user being told that their data doesn’t match the expected format (although the user can scroll past and try to submit the form anyway). Luke Wroblewski has done some excellent usability research on the inline validation techniques that work best.

Inline validation alleviates the aforementioned issues by indicating progress and by pointing out the erroneous fields (since the page does not reload). This makes the technique useful for forms in which the fields can be validated independently. In other cases, the data isn’t as simple as a user name, password and email address; sometimes the data needing validation is an array or a set of data. In the realm of e-commerce, one might need an address or credit card to be validated.

To live validate a credit card, you could perform a Luhn check to verify the format of the number, and you could verify the expiration date and security code (or “card verification valueâ€�) for the correct number and type of characters. However, the validation could still fail if the data doesn’t all match up when the payment vendor tries to authorize the card or if the card is declined. With live inline validation, the user would be first presented with a green checkmark as they input data in each field, and then they would see an error message after submitting the form if any of the fields didn’t check out. Alternatively, live inline validation could be disabled for just those fields for which the data has to be checked remotely. However, this has the drawback of an inconsistent UI, whereby some fields are validated live while others aren’t.

For address validators, the format of the inputted data could be correct, but the address itself could still fail validation (for example, if the address doesn’t exist). Again, live inline validation would begin here with checkmarks indicating to the user that the inputted data is correct, but then, when the user submits the address form, the website would (confusingly) change its mind and tell the user that it doesn’t recognize the address after all.

Our suggested approach, the fourth and last validation technique, tackles these problems.

4. Error Fields Only Approach

As we’ve seen, there are different ways to display error messages, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Based on these observations, we thought of a validation technique better suited to complex data. What if we removed all validated fields on the error page that reloads? What if we displayed only those fields that failed validation? So, instead of reloading the entire page and showing all 20 fields of the form when only the “Phone� and “Email� fields have errors, you would simply show a page with those two fields and the corresponding messages.

With this approach, the picture is quite different. The user now gets a new page, or an overlay, with just a couple of error fields. A summary of the validated data would also be displayed, along with an “Edit� link in case the user spots something they want to correct. Staples’ error page would then look something like this:

Mock-up of Error Fields Only approach
A simple mockup of what Staples’ error page would look like with this fourth approach. Only erroneous fields would be shown, and all validated data would be summarized below with an “Edit� link.

This approach makes the error page much more digestible than the traditional technique, and it makes abundantly clear which fields are the problem, which is particularly helpful in long forms.

Now, the user simply has to fix the fields shown and hit “Continueâ€� — no scrolling, no having to pick out erroneous fields from valid ones, no repetition of the same page, just a simple page explaining exactly what to fix and how to proceed.

When To Use Each Validation Technique

Compared to the two traditional reloading techniques (i.e. 1 and 2), the “live inline validation� and “error fields only� techniques both offer the user a sense of progression and a clear distinction between erroneous and valid fields.

The “error fields only� approach is usually best when inline validation wouldn’t quite work. In April 2012, we benchmarked the top 100 e-commerce websites in the world and found that only 8% use live inline validation during checkout (likely due to having to validate both postal addresses and credit cards). In general, the longer the form and the more complex the inputted data and its dependencies, the more likely the error-fields-only approach is the best choice.

Inline validation is effective for simpler forms. When the data is an array or set, such as with postal addresses and credit cards, then the method becomes problematic. In this case, the UI would be illogical (the user would see each field validated individually and then suddenly fail collectively) or inconsistent (only some fields would validate as the user types). Of course, this technique would still require the page to be reloaded as a fallback, in case the user submits the form regardless of inline error messages (or if they have disabled JavaScript); therefore, the page reload techniques (the traditional and newer versions) might be best even for simple forms.

On smartphones, the error-fields-only approach has an advantage over the same-page-reload technique, because users typically lack an overview and context of the form due to the small screen. In such cases, displaying only the erroneous fields would help the user focus on the task at hand.

Rethinking Validation Error Pages

The error-field-only approach is merely a concept, and it needs both refinement and testing. An even better solution to these user experience problems most likely exists. Maybe having a traditional (although optimized) error page with green checkmarks next to the validated fields on the error page (to indicate the user’s progress) would be a better solution; or perhaps applying a slight fade to validated fields, making the erroneous ones stand out, while maintaining the context of the page.

The error-fields-only approach is more an attempt to inspire and a call to action to rethink how we handle validation errors and thus provide a better user experience.

While we can agree that validation pages aren’t the sexiest part of Web design, we should give them attention because their quality will determine whether the user comes to a screeching halt or feels a small bump on the road.

Got your own examples, mockups and ideas for validation errors? Share them in the comments!

(al)


© Christian Holst for Smashing Magazine, 2012.


  •   
  • Copyright © 1996-2010 BlogmyQuery - BMQ. All rights reserved.
    iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress